Whilst a plethora of studies into the effects of the food system have shown how our eating habits effect the environment and climate change, none have taken into account the added greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused by medical care.
Researchers at the University of California and Oxford University conducted the first ever such study, combining both the potential decrease in (GHG) emissions from altered food production and from the decreased medical care required for dietary related diseases.
Model diets
Using existing data on the risk of contracting either colorectal cancer (CRC), type 2 diabetes (T2D) or coronary heart disease (CHD), foods most associated with the diseases were identified.
David Cleveland, chief researcher on the project, told FoodNavigator:
“To create healthier model diets, we altered the standard 2,000-calorie-a-day U.S. diet, changing the sources of about half of those calories. Fruit and vegetable intake was doubled, refined grains were partially replaced with whole grains, and red and processed meats reduced, with peas and beans increased to replace the meat protein removed. The second diet reduced red and processed meats further, and the third diet eliminated them completely. Added sugar, which is a known health risk, was not reduced, nor were dairy, eggs, fish or non-red meat.”
The reduced risk of contracting any of the three diseases, if either of the first two diets were adopted, would fall by 20% said Cleveland.
The third diet, in which no red meats were included, a 40% reduction was estimated.
Healthcare costs in the US would also drop by around $77bn (€72bn) and $93bn (€97bn) for the third diet annually, almost halving the yearly $230bn (€216bn) spent treating all three diseases.
GHG emissions
The effects of such massive reductions in healthcare costs would have an equally profound effect on GHG emissions – something not factored into previous studies, Cleveland said.
The energy required to treat such diseases is immense, he explained, and potential reductions in GHG emissions would be around 222kg per person per year, almost a fifth of the total.
Moreover, since neither sugar nor dairy, eggs and non-red meat were included in the study, its estimations should be seen as ‘very conservative’ Cleveland added.
The British Government’s Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition found sugar to be one of the most major causes of non-communicable diseases such as those analysed in the study, and further research including this in a fourth diet model would likely contribute even further to GHG savings.
Source: Journal of Climactic Change
Published 2017; doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-1912-5
"A healthier US diet could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from both the food and health care systems"
Authors: David A Cleveland, Elinor Hallström, Quentin Gee, Peter Scarborough